<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>.zugiart &#187; literature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zugiart.com/tag/literature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zugiart.com</link>
	<description>Software Engineering, buddhism, and everything else in between.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 05:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is God A Taoist?</title>
		<link>http://www.zugiart.com/2009/11/is-god-a-taoist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.zugiart.com/2009/11/is-god-a-taoist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buddhism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enlightenment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zugiart.com/?p=760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is God a Taoist? is a very, very well written piece of wisdom literature by Raymond M. Smullyan, 1977 that guides the reader through the process of realization of the truth. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is God a Taoist? is a very, very well written piece of wisdom literature by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Smullyan">Raymond M. Smullyan</a>, 1977. By reading through this text, it&#8217;s as if the author had gently held my hand and guided me through the process of realization, or perhaps the process of enlightenment.</p>
<p>In realizing the truth, perhaps it can be said that I have walked through the valley of death while reading this text, or that I have seen a glimpse of enlightenment, even though I may not have the capacity to retain the light for an extended duration. A very curious piece of literature indeed!</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>God, to a mortal questioning His existence:</strong></p>
<p>First of all it is inaccurate to speak of my role in the scheme of things. I am the scheme of things. Secondly, it is equally misleading to speak of my aiding the process of sentient beings attaining enlightenment. I am the process.</p>
<p>The ancient Taoists were quite close when they said of me (whom they called &#8220;Tao&#8221;) that I do not do things, yet through me all things get done. In more modem terms, I am not the cause of Cosmic Process, I am Cosmic Process itself. I think the most accurate and fruitful definition of me which man can frame &#8212; at least in his present state of evolution &#8212; is that I am the very process of enlightenment.</p></blockquote>
<p>I have mirrored the text into my notes (<a href="/notes/buddhism/is-god-a-taoist">here</a>), but I really do not wish to <em>plagiarize</em> Raymond&#8217;s work, and so if you do wish to read it, I urge you to check out his web site here:<br />
<a href="http://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/godTaoist.html">http://www.mit.edu/people/dpolicar/writing/prose/text/godTaoist.html</a></p>
<p>I sincerely hope that you enjoyed the journey as much as I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.zugiart.com/2009/11/is-god-a-taoist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

